Nordic Tools Comparison: The Judging Criteria

This is just a big old checklist to make sure that I apply at least half-way objective criteria for comparing the platforms. There’s nothing scientific about it, but I think it covers most of the bases you’d want to cover with something like this. I wasn’t too fastidious about following this to the letter. If something wasn’t really relevant for a platform (or if I finding out the information would be too onerous), I just skipped it.

Installation

Quick start

Documentation

Basic workflow

The stuff you do every day:

Fancy workflows

Stuff you might not do every day, but that you might want to (testing and CI you can set up yourself as long as you can do command line builds without too much trouble, but extra support for them is sure nice to have):

Functionality

Frustration

Basically: Did implementing the example programs make Ian angry?